LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Arkansas - January 5, 2006

  
Camp v. State, No. CR04-1368, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 5, 2006, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: In a DWI case, although many procedural errors occurred in defendant's prior DWI cases, the trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion to strike the prior convictions as none of the errors rose to the level of a jurisdictional defect resulting from the failure to appoint counsel. Thus, U.S. Const. amend. VI was not violated.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Carner v. State, No. CR 05-1207, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 5, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: State supreme court held that it was not the responsibility of trial court clerk, trial court, or anyone other than inmate to perfect the appeal of the denial of his Ark. R. Crim. P. 37.1 petition for postconviction relief. Thus, inmate had shown no good cause for his failure to file a timely notice of appeal under Ark. R. App. P. Crim. 2(a)(4).

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Fondren v. State, No. CR 05-250, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 5, 2006, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: In a fleeing and manslaughter case where an officer died during a high speed pursuit of defendant who fled from a store after stealing candy, the trial court did not err by submitting a manslaughter instruction as fleeing under Ark. Code Ann. § 5-54-125 was an appropriate underlying felony to support a conviction under Ark. Code Ann. § 5-10-104.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Fryar v. Touchstone Physical Therapy, Inc., No. 05-394, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 5, 2006, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Gardner v. State, No. CR05-472, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 5, 2006, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion for directed verdict as there was sufficient evidence to support defendant's conviction of the underlying felony, aggravated robbery under Ark. Code Ann. § 5-12-103, and of capital-murder under Ark. Code Ann. § 5-10-101(a)(1), after eliminating the accomplice testimony.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Hackelton v. Malloy, No. 04-358, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 5, 2006, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: In wrongful death action under Ark. Code Ann. § 16-62-102, amended complaint did incorporate by reference contents of plaintiff's initial complaint which she did not have standing to bring because she had not yet been appointed administrator of decedent's estate and because she was not sole heir. Amended complaint was within limitations period.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Henry v. Buchanan, No. 05-533, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 5, 2006, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: Where grandparents' daughter, the child's biological mother, was still alive and had consented to the adoption proceedings, there was no statutory authority that required the adoptive mother to give notice of the adoption proceedings to the grandparents to adopt the grandparents' grandchild.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Lawrence v. City of Texarkana, No. 05-310, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 5, 2006, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: Fireman's appeal from his termination from the city fire department was dismissed for want of jurisdiction as the civil service commission, in affirming the termination, made no written order or any findings of fact or conclusions of law as required by Ark. Code Ann. § 14-51-308(e)(1)(B)(ii).

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
McArty v. Morgan, No. 04-1086, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 5, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
McArty v. State, No. CR 05-951, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 5, 2006, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: In a murder case, defendant's appeal from the denial of his petition for postconviction relief through Ark. R. Civ. P. 60 was dismissed as defendant could not prevail on appeal from the denial order, and Rule 60 did not apply in criminal matters.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.