 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Ross v. State, CR 01-177,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 10, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant lacked standing to challenge the vagueness of a statute that required owners to permit their horses to a research facility if the animal tested positive for infectious anemia, where she never attempted to "permit" her infected horse.
|
|||||
| State v. Pruitt, CR 01-776,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 10, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court's suppression of evidence and subsequent statement was fact intensive. State's appeal was not based on alleged misinterpretation of the law; appeal was not properly before appellate court and the appellate court dismissed.
|
|||||
| Thetford v. State, CR 99-1352,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 10, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant failed to demonstrate that conflict of interest between counsel and deputy prosecutor that adversely affected counsel's performance. Questioning of witnesses was trial strategy and not basis for ineffective assistance of counsel claim.
|
|||||
| Thompson v. State, CR 00-923,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 10, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly denied defendant's request for postconviction relief from convictions as a habitual offender of first-degree murder and being a felon possessing a firearm, as he did not show he received ineffective assistance of counsel.
|
|||||
| Wooten v. State, CR 01-986,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 10, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
