 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Al-Amin v. State, CACR03-1317,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, January 12, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's attorney was not permitted to withdraw where a potential issue for appeal existed concerning defendant's conviction and sentence for third-degree battery without a trial or plea hearing.
|
|||||
| Cobb v. Leyendecker, CA 04-427,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISIONS THREE AND FOUR, January 12, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment in favor of a lender was reversed because the loan to the borrower for $ 25,000 was an oral contract, as the terms were not recorded in any writing, and thus the action was governed by a three-year statute of limitations.
|
|||||
| Conery v. State, CACR03-986,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, January 12, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Ferguson v. State, CACR03-1322,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, January 12, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred allowing introduction of name and nature of defendant's prior offense where unfair prejudice was significant; jury could find guilt on assault charges based on response to prior assault charge rather than make rational decision.
|
|||||
| Foster v. State, CACR 04-110,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, January 12, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Hart v. State, CACR03-1297,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, January 12, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Counsel's motion to withdraw was granted where there was sufficient evidence from probation supervisor and officer at sheriff's office to support trial court's finding that defendant had inexcusably failed to comply with conditions of his probation.
|
|||||
| Hatton v. State, CACR 03-1425,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, January 12, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Revocation of probation was proper where there was evidence that defendant violated all three alleged bases for revocation. Direct appeal of a verdict was not the appropriate vehicle through which defendant could challenge denial of appeal bond.
|
|||||
| K & J's Trucking, Inc. v. Seay, CA04-189,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, January 12, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err when it held that transporter was not liable for check on which client of company that it transported vehicles for stopped payment because under their contract transporter was not responsible for collecting company's debts.
|
|||||
| Lee v. State, CACR02-1141,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, January 12, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's appeal was without merit and no reversible error was committed; therefore, defendant's counsel's motion to withdraw as counsel was granted.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
