Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
   State Courts - Arkansas - January 14, 2004
  
Johnson v. Dir. of the Ark. Empl. Sec. Dep't , E 03-48, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, January 14, 2004, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: Employee was properly denied unemployment benefits, where she was discharged for misconduct in connection with her work; her failure to follow the employer's rules constituted a wanton and willful action warranting termination.

Search Cases for Free
  
Lee v. State, CACR02-1141, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, January 14, 2004, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: An attorney's no-merit brief was deficient under the relevant rule, given that the attorney failed to abstract all rulings; thus, the attorney's motion to withdraw was denied and the court ordered rebriefing.

Search Cases for Free
  
Maxwell v. State, CACR03-55, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, January 14, 2004, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Because officers did not have probable cause to arrest defendant behind his shop, an incriminating statement made to officers and a consent to search the property were not admissible; therefore, two drug convictions were overturned.

Search Cases for Free
  
Myles v. State, CACR 02-774, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, January 14, 2004, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court was without jurisdiction to revoke defendant's probation in one action as probationary period had expired. Revocation of suspended sentence for other action was proper given defendant's violation by fleeing an officer.

Search Cases for Free
  
Parmley v. State, CACR03-71, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, January 14, 2004, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Because defendant, by not appearing for his arraignment and leaving the state, caused a four-month delay, the four months were excluded for purposes of calculating his speedy trial period; his speedy trial rights were not violated.

Search Cases for Free
  
Phillips v. State, CACR02-1238, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, January 14, 2004, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free
  
Phillips v. State, CACR02-1240, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, January 14, 2004, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court did not err in refusing to allow defendant to continue thanking his family at sentencing because such was not relevant; sentencing procedure was followed and the sentence imposed was proper.

Search Cases for Free
  
Reeves v. State, CACR03-05, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, January 14, 2004, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant could not challenge sufficiency of evidence on appeal because he did not move for dismissal at close of evidence, denial of defendant's objections to State witnesses was proper, and cross-examination of defendant was not prejudicial.

Search Cases for Free
  
Sharp v. State, CACR03-219, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, January 14, 2004, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: In an appeal after the revocation of probation, defense counsel was not permitted to withdraw because there was a non-frivolous issue existing as to whether trial court was allowed to impose an additional suspended sentence after revoking probation.

Search Cases for Free
  
Smith v. State, CACR 03-20, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, January 14, 2004, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free
  
Back to Top
  


Copyright© 2011 LexisNexis®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.