 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| McCrary v. State, CACR 04-67,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, January 12, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant testified that he had not paid any restitution because he believed was ordered to pay $ 12,000, but that he owed only $ 6,207. That did not excuse his paying nothing and his probation was properly revoked and counsel allowed to withdraw.
|
|||||
| McIntosh v. Alliant Food Serv., CA04-546,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, January 12, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The employee's testimony did not establish a causal relationship to a work-related incident, and there was no medical evidence supported by objective findings establishing the existence of a new injury in December 2001.
|
|||||
| Munn v. State, CACR02-1246,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, January 12, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellate counsel's motion to withdraw from defendant's appeal did not conform to the supreme court rule because although counsel abstracted and discussed the majority of the adverse trial rulings, not all of the rulings were abstracted or discussed.
|
|||||
| Nolen v. State, CACR03-1244,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, January 12, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court did not err in ordering defendants to pay restitution given the victim's testimony concerning the stolen property.
|
|||||
| Office of Child Support Enforcement v. Pyron, CA 04-360,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, January 12, 2005, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where state office of child support enforcement agreed statute of limitations had run on its claim, court did not err in refusing to set aside its dismissal when office later claimed another state's law with no limitation should have been applied.
|
|||||
| Patrick v. State, CACR03-1319,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, January 12, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court denied counsel's motion to withdraw in defendant's appeal of his rape conviction because counsel did not address each adverse ruling in his appellate brief; one ruling unaddressed was denial of defendant's motion to pierce rape shield statute.
|
|||||
| Perkins v. State, CACR04-169,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, January 12, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Counsel's brief accompanying motion to withdraw failed to comply with court rule because, inter alia, there was no transcript of the pretrial hearing and the court reporter's certificate only purported to contain the proceedings of the day of trial.
|
|||||
| Rankin v. Dir., Ark. Empl. Sec. Dep't, E 03-51,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, January 12, 2005, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Robinson v. State, CACR 04-297,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, January 12, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defense counsel's motion to withdraw because appeal was without merit was granted where only argument preserved for appeal was challenge to sufficiency of evidence and testimony of eyewitness amounted to substantial evidence supporting convictions.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
