 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Stevenson v. State Circuit Judge, CACR02-935,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, January 14, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the State proved that (1) one of defendant's probation conditions was to not violate any laws, and (2) defendant had been arrested for breaking and entering, there was sufficient evidence to support a probation revocation.
|
|||||
| Wallace v. State, CACR03-471,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, January 14, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because defendant's counsel's no-merit brief failed to comply with the requirements of Anders and relevant statutes, rebriefing was ordered, and counsel was not permitted to withdraw from the case.
|
|||||
| Watson v. State, CACR02-1305,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, January 14, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's actions in refusing to return a company truck and in leaving it in a parking lot of a hotel constituted the knowing taking of property such that the court affirmed defendant's theft conviction.
|
|||||
| Wyrick v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs., CA03-442,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, January 14, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The termination of the mother's parental rights was proper, where the mother failed to make substantial progress and was unlikely to comply with court orders and case plan goals in a reasonable amount of time.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
