 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Watkins v. State, CACR05-70,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, January 11, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A court denied an attorney's motion to withdraw as counsel on the ground that defendant's appeal of his probation revocation was without merit because the attorney's brief did not meet the requirements of Ark. Sup. Ct. & Ct. App. R. 4-3(j)(1); the brief failed to discuss or list the denial of defendant's motion to suppress evidence.
|
|||||
| Willis v. State, CACR04-1134,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, January 11, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Zachary v. State, CACR 05-63,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, January 11, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence was sufficient to convict defendant of failure to appear under Ark. Code Ann. ¿ 5-54-120(a)(2) where defendant failed to provide a reasonable excuse for his failure to appear; counsel's motion to withdraw under Ark. Sup. Ct. & Ct. App. R. 4-3(j) was granted as there was no non-frivolous argument to be made on appeal.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
