 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Robinson v. State, CR 03-1251,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 13, 2005, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Supreme court denied motion of pro se defendant to file a belated nonconforming brief where defendant had been afforded more than one year to submit a brief that conformed to court rules and pro se status did not entitle him to special consideration.
|
|||||
| Springdale Sch. Dist. No. 50 v. Evans Law Firm, P.A., 04-436,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 13, 2005, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Individual was not taxpayer in the school district. He was not aggrieved by supreme court's decision that attorneys' fee award to be paid by district was in error. On remand, court erred in modifying award of fees where there was no proper plaintiff.
|
|||||
| State v. Pittman, CR 04-821,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 13, 2005, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a forgery case, the trial court erred in granting defendant's motion to suppress defendant's statement, as it was spontaneous and not the product of custodial interrogation; a request for handwriting samples did not call for any verbal response.
|
|||||
| White v. State, No. CR 88-120,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 13, 2005, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court denied petitioner's request for copy of his appellate transcript at public expense pursuant to Arkansas Freedom of Information Act because he made no reference to need for documentary evidence to support allegation in postconviction proceeding.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
