 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Curry v. State, CACR 04-271,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, January 19, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant told police that his father killed the victim, resulting in his father's arrest, the police did not find the body where defendant said it was located. His statements constituted filing a false report.
|
|||||
| Farr v. Farr, CA 04-409,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, January 19, 2005, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court properly found that money held by and money loaned to husband's son were separate items of property; money repaid by sons during separation was marital property. Wife could be awarded portion of accounts receivable from sons' failed business.
|
|||||
| Frigon v. Frigon, CA 03-1229,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, January 19, 2005, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in deviating from a mandate regarding a wife's entitlement to proceeds of her former husband's disability income protection policy because it only awarded wife one-half of funds received from subject claim until end of policy term.
|
|||||
| Gibson v. State, CA 04-365,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, January 19, 2005, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err when it credited medical opinion that, due to acquittee's seizure condition and medication, he remained at risk of harming others, over testimony of acquittee's witnesses, and continued his commitment.
|
|||||
| Jones v. Scott, CA04-10,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, January 19, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A court could not reach the merits of maternal grandparents' action challenging an award of guardianship to paternal grandparents because the addendum filed by the maternal grandparents did not include a copy of either guardianship petition.
|
|||||
| Kiddy v. Shipman, CA04-402,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, January 19, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court erred in determining that the custodial parent, the mother, had to prove a real advantage to relocating; instead, the non-custodial parent, the father, had the burden of rebutting the presumption in favor of relocation.
|
|||||
| Lee v. Tyson Foods, Inc., CA 04-249,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, January 19, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court lacked jurisdiction over worker's appeal from Workers' Compensation Commission's order involving applicability of exclusive-remedy protection because circuit court retained jurisdiction of worker's suit when it transferred issues to Commission.
|
|||||
| Looneys' Truck Tire Ctr., Inc. v. Patterson, CA04-325,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, January 19, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Order awarding employee workers' compensation benefits was upheld because evidence showed that the employee, a truck driver, sustained hernia injury while unloading his truck; employee described his pain as severe and stopped working for 20 minutes.
|
|||||
| Mays v. Hamilton House Rest., CA04-576,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, January 19, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Decision of the Arkansas Workers' Compensation Commission that found that the employee's subsequent wrist injury was not compensable was affirmed because there was evidence that the injury was not related to the compensable knee injury.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
