 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Pardue v. Norris, No. 06-335,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 18, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of habeas corpus relief was affirmed because the amended information charging the inmate with aggravated robbery named the inmate, set out the offense charged, provided the statute under which the charge was brought, specified the county where the offense was committed, and stated the facts asserted to constitute the offense.
|
|||||
| Sheridan v. State, No. CR 06-695,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 18, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant was stopped and cited for DWI, the roadblock orchestrated by the police was not an illegal detention. The Fourth Amendment did not require the lieutenant to get permission from an elected official before establishing a safety checkpoint. Defendant was not entitled to suppress evidence gathered during the stop.
|
|||||
| Sims v. Circuit Court, No. 06-100,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 18, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Property owner sought extraordinary relief when an earlier judgment of a circuit court was declared void ab initio by another circuit court, which presided over a business entity's dissolution pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 4-27-1432(a); however, petition was denied because property owner still had adequate legal remedy available via direct appeal.
|
|||||
| Sowders v. St. Joseph's Mercy Health Ctr. , No. 06-414,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 18, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment was affirmed because under the charitable-immunity doctrine, the claimant could not bring suit against the hospital, a charitable facility, and the health system did not meet the statutory definition of an insurer under the Arkansas Insurance Code, as it was not in the business of entering into contracts of insurance.
|
|||||
| Tucker v. Office of Child Support Enforcement , No. 06-1143,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 18, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Modification of child support was affirmed because the circuit court first considered the father's tax returns and it was only after finding the tax returns unreliable that the circuit court proceeded to the net-worth approach, and the use of the net-worth approach in determining the father's disposable income was not clearly erroneous.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
