 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Ark. Dep't of Human Servs. v. Collier, 02-1021,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 23, 2003, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Statutory language clearly defined "juvenile" as an individual from birth to age eighteen. Thus, the unborn fetus did not fall within the definition as by it very nature, there was no birth and the lower court judge exceeded her authority.
|
|||||
| Barnes v. Everett, 01-1148,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 23, 2003, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in denying admission of damages assessed in the default trial as it was of little probative value and was prejudicial to the attorney. The client's proposed jury instruction improperly modified the issue of negligence.
|
|||||
| Bennett v. Collier, 02-1327,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 23, 2003, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: After terminating the mother's parental rights to her son, the trial court lost jurisdiction to hold her in contempt for not remaining drug free; therefore, it erred by incarcerating her for contempt to protect her unborn fetus from her drug use.
|
|||||
| Cathey v. State, CR 02-318,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 23, 2003, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's failure to renew his motion for a directed verdict until after the jury had returned a guilty verdict in his capital murder prosecution waived any error in the denial of that motion on appeal.
|
|||||
| City of Dover v. City of Russellville, 02-308,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 23, 2003, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because town's brief failed to include an abstract of the hearing on the motion appealed and copies of pleading essential to an understanding of the case, the appellate court found the brief deficient and could not reach the merits of the case.
|
|||||
| Edmond v. State, CR 01-1050,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 23, 2003, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a photograph of a victim's head after autopsy was useful in a medical examiner's testimony regarding the nature of the wound, a trial court did not abuse its discretion by admitting it into evidence.
|
|||||
| Ford Motor Co. v. Harper, No. 01-1286,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 23, 2003, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Whether an appellate court had jurisdiction to review a pre-trial discovery order with respect to which privileges attached to documents sought for production was an important issue which required briefing by the parties.
|
|||||
| Gamble v. State, CR 02-688,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 23, 2003, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a theft trial, a witness was permitted to testify as to the contents of defendant's confession because the State did not attempt to introduce a transcript of such; therefore, the best evidence rule was not applicable.
|
|||||
| Hamilton v. Jones, 02-749,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 23, 2003, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
