 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Blackwell v. State, CR 98-456,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 24, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Dentist's error coram nobis petition was denied where all of the issues he raised either could have been, or were, addressed in the trial court and on direct appeal, or could have been a basis for a timely postconviction relief petition.
|
|||||
| Gregory v. State, CR 00-161,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 24, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although trial court's original order was set aside, it should have been included with record. Defendant had responsibility of producing sufficient record; failure to do so prevented appellate court from reaching merits of his argument.
|
|||||
| Hammon v. State, CR 00-1259; CR 00-1383; CR 00-1275,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 24, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an appeal of a denial of postconviction relief, when court-appointed counsel was allowed to withdraw for sufficient cause shown , the postconviction petitioner was entitled to appointment of new counsel only upon proper motion.
|
|||||
| Hill v. State, CR 00-1210,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 24, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Counsel was not ineffective for not objecting to argument raising mitigation witnesses' bias against death penalty, or for failing to appeal denial of mitigation definition, parole eligibility instructions, and admission of prior convictions.
|
|||||
| In re Appointments to Ark. Continuing Legal Educ. Bd., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 24, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Jones v. State, CR 01-965,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 24, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Delay in defendant's trial resulted from nolle prosequi and was result of lack of evidence, which was permissible, defendant was tried within one-year time requirement. Enhancement provided guide in fixing final punishment on charged offense.
|
|||||
| Martin v. State, CR 01-83,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 24, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Strawhacker v. State, CR 00-1417,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 24, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of post-conviction relief was proper as defendant failed to show how counsel was ineffective for failing to file motions to suppress; defendant's allegations did not show he was prejudiced or that trial's outcome would have been different.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
