 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Brown v. Arkansas Dep't of Correction, 98-1012,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, December 16, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court did not err by granting appellees' motion to dismiss; appellant failed to set forth facts sufficient to state a claim and, although was pro se, did not receive any special considerations for not knowing the law.
|
|||||
| Buchheit v. State, CR 98-1042,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, December 16, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Lawyer who did not tell defendant prior to guilty plea that he would have to serve 70 percent of sentence before parole did not have a constitutional duty to do so, and did not provide ineffective assistance of counsel.
|
|||||
| Burton v. State, No. CR 99-1008,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, December 16, 1999, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant's claims in his habeas corpus motion were not sufficient to demonstrate that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to try appellant for aggravated assault or that the commitment issued upon conviction was invalid.
|
|||||
| Doss v. State, No. CR 98-1128,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, December 16, 1999, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An order denying a motion to withdraw a guilty plea based on ineffective assistance of counsel and defendant's alleged intoxication was affirmed because the ruling was not clearly against the preponderance of the evidence.
|
|||||
| Holbert v. Arkansas County, CR99-886,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, December 16, 1999, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's petition for a writ of prohibition was denied because there was a factual dispute over whether defendant was or was not available for arrest so that the trial could occur within the 12-month statutory period.
|
|||||
| Johnson v. State, CR 98-1210,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, December 16, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant's post conviction relief petition was timely when filed within 60 days following the reviewing court's mandate affirming appellant's suspended sentence revocation.
|
|||||
| McArty v. Judicial Discipline & Disability Comm'n, No. 99-1225,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, December 16, 1999, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petitioner was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis because an affidavit from an authorized officer at petitioner's place of incarceration indicated that petitioner's balance on deposit there was $ 4.77.
|
|||||
| Simpson v. State, CR98-423,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, December 16, 1999, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction affirmed because the jury was properly instructed, the prosecutor had discretion to seek the death penalty, and defendant had no property or possessory interest in the vehicle searched.
|
|||||
| Thetford v. State, CR99-1352,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, December 16, 1999, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
