 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Barrientos v. State, CA CR 00-279,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, February 7, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: That appellant's car was weaving within its own lane, and that the officer's felt the driver might be sleepy, did not constitute probable cause to stop appellant, so the trial court erred in not suppressing evidence found after the stop.
|
|||||
| Cunningham v. Walker, CA 00-533,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, February 7, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Co-tenants' claim to own property by adverse possession was rejected, as all co-tenants were relatives, and thus, those claiming adverse possession had a heavy burden to show they put other co-tenants on notice that their claims were adverse.
|
|||||
| Epps v. State, CA CR 99-869,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISIONS ONE AND TWO, February 7, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Though trial judge interrupted defense counsel's witness examinations with adverse evidentiary rulings, made sua sponte, he had authority to do so, and as his rulings were correct and did not indicate bias, reviewing court found no error.
|
|||||
| Erickson v. Erickson, CA00-421,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, February 7, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The appellate court modified the trial court's decision by deleting the finding of a constructive trust; the trial court had no authority to award 1,890 shares of stock to appellee's brother.
|
|||||
| Holsted v. McVay, CA 00-398,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, February 7, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Adoption order was affirmed; step-father and child's mother proved natural father failed significantly without justifiable cause to provide care and support for child. Father's lack of communication with child was also without justifiable cause.
|
|||||
| Hopper v. Daniel, CA 00-464,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISIONS ONE AND FOUR, February 7, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As the time spent in finding missing heirs was as necessary for appellants' adverse-possession case as it was for their partition action, their claim for the attorney fees thereby incurred was properly denied.
|
|||||
| McDougal v. State, CACR00-718,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, February 7, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As appellant, who was convicted of refusal to submit to arrest, failed to make a directed-verdict motion regarding that charge to the trial court, the issue of the factual sufficiency of the evidence was not preserved for appellate review.
|
|||||
| McIntosh v. State, CACR 00-466,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, February 7, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Domestic battery conviction was reversed and remanded as the defendant did not knowingly and intelligently waive his right to counsel at trial.
|
|||||
| Moreland v. Hortman, CA 00-527,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, February 7, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Child support cases could only be consolidated when there was pending litigation; child support obligation was incorrectly calculated; reduction in child support obligation was error as there was no evidence of payor's gross income.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
