 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Moses v. State, CA CR 00-119,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, February 7, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in denying directed verdict motion in prosecution for stalking where evidence sufficiently showed course of harassing conduct. Double jeopardy did not attach based on prior conviction since incidents were distinguishable.
|
|||||
| Norwood v. Bailey, CA00-556,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, February 7, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Grant to appellees of a prescriptive easement to a lane that ran across appellants' property was not clearly erroneous. The evidence established the disputed lane had been in existence, and used by a prior owner of appellees' land, for 20 years.
|
|||||
| Rabb v. State, CA CR 00-153,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, February 7, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Simultaneous possession of drugs and firearm conviction was reversed; large amount of methamphetamine was sufficient nexus between the controlled substance and the rifle, but the rifle was not loaded and hence not readily accessible for use.
|
|||||
| Starks v. State, CACR00-39,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISIONS ONE AND TWO, February 7, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Rebriefing was ordered in appeal of criminal conviction as it appeared the issue of standing to challenge the warrantless search of a house was not an issue at trial and was raised by the State for the first time on appeal.
|
|||||
| Syakhasone v. State, CA CR 00-496,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, February 7, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in denying motion to suppress evidence where police officers failed to adhere to knock-and-announce rule and they failed to articulate justifiable or exigent circumstances warranting such conduct.
|
|||||
| Teague v. State, CACR00-722,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, February 7, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant, whose suspended sentence for possession of a controlled substance was revoked, could not raise issue of insufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction and revocation for the first time on appeal.
|
|||||
| Turnage v. State, CACR 00-777,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, February 7, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Circumstantial evidence of items found which were commonly used in the manufacture of methamphetamine, including residue of finished product, was sufficient to sustain possession conviction. Jury could infer intent on these circumstances.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
