 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Reed v. Ark. Auctioneer's Licensing Bd., CA 03-472,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, January 28, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As appellant's knowingly making false statement to government agency so as to obtain workers' compensation benefits to which he was not entitled was a crime involving moral turpitude, state statute authorized revocation of his auctioneer's license.
|
|||||
| Russell v. State, CACR 03-402,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, January 28, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's appeal following his alleged conditional guilty plea was dismissed, where the trial court's order did not indicate that it accepted the plea and that he voluntarily, intelligently, and knowingly entered a negotiated plea of guilty.
|
|||||
| Sims v. State, CACR03-461,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, January 28, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Circuit court had subject-matter jurisdiction to change conditions of defendant's probated sentence and jurisdiction to revoke. Finding that defendant had inexcusably failed to complete probation terms was not against preponderance of evidence.
|
|||||
| Smith v. City of Fort Smith, CA 03-530,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISIONS FOUR AND ONE, January 28, 2004, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Substantial evidence supported the finding that the employee was not performing employment services at the time of his injury; it was not a necessary function for the employee to be loading the gravel for his personal use.
|
|||||
| Trout v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs., CA 03-332,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISIONS THREE AND FOUR, January 28, 2004, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Order terminating a mother's parental rights was reversed, where sufficient evidence showed that she worked to maintain stability in her home, obtained employment, addressed her medical problems, and made significant steps towards reunification.
|
|||||
| Venis v. State, CACR02-920,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, January 28, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence of paraphernalia used in manufacturing methamphetamine that was obtained during defendant's other arrests was admissible to prove that he intended to manufacture methamphetamine with pseudoephedrine found in his vehicle in his first arrest.
|
|||||
| Walker v. State, CACR03-134,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, January 28, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant failed to argue to the trial court that she could not be ordered to indemnify the victim's insurance company, as it was not an aggrieved party entitled to restitution, she did not adequately preserve the issue for appellate review.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
