 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| American Storage, Inc. v. West, No. CA99-570,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, December 22, 1999, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: On appeal, appellant was procedurally barred from raising issues of unresolved material fact because the issues were not raised in the trial court.
|
|||||
| Batts v. State, No. CACR99-468,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, December 22, 1999, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence that criminal appellant was hostile and angry toward persons attempting to care for his injuries was relevant to establish that appellant, while resisting being handcuffed, knowingly caused officer's injury.
|
|||||
| Bell v. Bell, No. CA 99-503,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, December 22, 1999, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Chancellor's order of visitation did not comply with court's mandate in that it allowed substantially equal visitation between appellant father and appellee mother contrary to the best interest of the child.
|
|||||
| Carmical v. McAfee, CA99-430,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, December 22, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment was properly granted in a suit for malicious prosecution and abuse of discretion, since appellants failed to prove the elements of those torts; also, there was no basis for appellants' motion to recuse the judge.
|
|||||
| Cullers v. State, No. CACR99-337,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, December 22, 1999, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court properly admitted expert evidence and testimony in a criminal case over appellant's objection, because the evidence admitted assisted the trier of fact in his or her understanding of the evidence presented.
|
|||||
| Davis v. State, No. CACR99-636,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, December 22, 1999, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A statement made by the victim during the traumatic occurrence of robbery qualified as an excited utterance exception to the hearsay rule, and substantial evidence supported the trial court's denial of appellant's motion to dismiss.
|
|||||
| Davis v. State, CACR99-164,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, December 22, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Police had no suspicion, reasonable or otherwise, that appellant's vehicle contained contraband until after the officer stuck his head into appellant's truck and smelled marijuana.
|
|||||
| Dixon v. Dixon, No. CA99-463,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, December 22, 1999, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellee's thorough documentation of appellant's spending, and appellant's corresponding lack of documentation, resulted in an award of damages in favor of appellee for appellant's improper depletion of estate assets.
|
|||||
| Douglas Tobacco Prods. Co. v. Gerrald, CA 99-642,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, December 22, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The Second Injury Fund was partially liable for appellee's compensable injury and subsequent wage loss, and appellee's 50 percent wage-loss award was supported by substantial evidence.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
