 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Allen v. Greenland, 01-447,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 31, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Untimely answer in personal injury action could not be stricken where insurer filed timely answer raising same defenses, and sanctions motion required evidentiary hearing. Answer amendment alleging failure to use seatbelt was properly stricken.
|
|||||
| Arnett v. State, CR 01-265,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 31, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's claims were procedurally barred because she failed to provide full synopsis abstract of letters the she purported were material to her defense; thus, appellate court could not assess claims of ineffectiveness under Strickland standard.
|
|||||
| Dansby v. State, CR 00-1218,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 31, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's appellate counsel who sought postconviction relief in a death penalty case was given 30 days to revise the trial abstract so the supreme court could properly review his client's claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel.
|
|||||
| Davis v. State, CR 01-57,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 31, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Counsel was not ineffective for failing to object to witness testimony as hearsay, as testimony fell under hearsay exception rule. Decision by counsel to file Anders brief was matter of professional judgment, not claim of ineffectiveness.
|
|||||
| Ford v. Ford, 01-554,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 31, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err by awarding custody to father as mother's decisions and failure to pay child support influenced trial court's judgment. Calculation of child-support award could include non-periodic sources of income.
|
|||||
| Johnson v. Goins, 01-1243,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 31, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Koch v. State, CR 00-1189,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 31, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: State could introduce jar of methamphetamine into evidence under res gestae exception. Substantial evidence supported conviction; thus, defendant was not prejudiced by counsel's failure to make a proper directed verdict motion.
|
|||||
| Looney v. State, CR 01-1308,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 31, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a retained trial defense attorney filed a timely notice of appeal, but failed to perfect the appeal or withdraw from representation, the state supreme court appointed him as appellate counsel to secure the remainder of the record.
|
|||||
| Martin v. State, CR 01-1072,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 31, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
