 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Eldridge v. State, No. CA 99-177,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, December 22, 1999, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant juvenile brothers charged with the first-degree murder of their father were not entitled to transfer to juvenile court where the serious and violent nature of the charge was enough to try appellants as adults.
|
|||||
| Elliott v. State, No. CACR99-666,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, December 22, 1999, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant did not overcome the presumption regarding the possession or control of recently stolen property, because defendant's offer of a reasonable explanation did not mean that the trial judge had to believe that explanation.
|
|||||
| Flippo v. State, No. CACR 99-442,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, December 22, 1999, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Testimony by appellant's ex-wife of past physical abuse was not prejudicial to appellant with regard to his jury conviction for terroristic threatening, battery, and criminal mischief.
|
|||||
| Gordon v. Atlas Carriers, No. CA 99-453,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, December 22, 1999, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Workers' Compensation Commission's treatment of appellant's award was proper, where substantial basis existed for denial of temporary total disability benefits beyond the date appellant was released from his physician's care.
|
|||||
| Hamilton v. Rheem Air Conditioning Div., No. CA99-610,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, December 22, 1999, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant worker was not entitled to permanent partial disability benefits and vocational rehabilitation because her treating physicians opined that the compensable injury resolved itself and testing produced normal results.
|
|||||
| James v. State, No. CACR99-469,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, December 22, 1999, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although court could not reach merits of criminal appellant's arguments because they were barred, motion to suppress was properly denied where police had probable cause to search appellant's car.
|
|||||
| Johnson v. Arkansas Dep't of Human Servs., No. CA 99-286,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, December 22, 1999, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant's parental rights were terminated because appellant's denial of his drug problem and his refusal to seek help presented potential harm to his children.
|
|||||
| Jones v. State, No. CACR 99-320,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, December 22, 1999, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A spoon, lighter, and syringe found on appellant's person following a search incident to his arrest was substantial evidence supporting his conviction for possession of drug paraphernalia.
|
|||||
| Miller v. State, CACR99-52,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, December 22, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The conviction for possession of cocaine was dismissed because appellee did not present sufficient evidence of any factor, other than occupancy of a vehicle, to establish appellant's constructive possession of the cocaine.
|
|||||
| Owen v. State, No. CACR 99-480,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, December 22, 1999, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Criminal appellant's motion to dismiss on double jeopardy grounds after aborting his first trial on his own motion was denied since state's conduct in first trial was not intended to goad appellant into moving for a mistrial.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
