 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Mayberry v. Flowers, No. 00-1460,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 31, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Natural father's actual post-decree knowledge of parental rights termination in adoption proceeding of which he had no notice, gained before expiration of limitations period for decree challenge, did not bar setting decree aside after that period.
|
|||||
| Payton v. State, CR 01-370,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 31, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was properly denied postconviction relief where the record showed trial counsel effectively used testimony by the defendant's mother and closing argument during the sentencing phase.
|
|||||
| Robinson v. Norris, 01-1219,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 31, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's motion to supplement the record and abstract in his brief of an appeal of denial of habeas corpus relief was moot where it was obvious he could not prevail on appeal.
|
|||||
| Robinson v. State, CR 01-351,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 31, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Counsel for defendants was ordered to show cause why he should not be held in contempt for failure to comply with the supreme court's order concerning reconstruction of trial exhibits for purposes of his clients' appeal.
|
|||||
| Sanders v. State, CR 01-1339,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 31, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Scott v. State, CR 01-1171,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 31, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Short v. Westark Cmty. College, 01-753,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 31, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Community college was state agency entitled to sovereign immunity protection from employee's suit alleging failure to accommodate his disability, and immunity had not been legislatively waived.
|
|||||
| Smith v. State, CR00-1026,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 31, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Ward v. State, CR 00-1322,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 31, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Abstract presented was flagrantly deficient, but affirming for deficient abstract would be unduly harsh result in death-penalty case. Defendant's counsel was ordered to abstract relevant portions of trial at his own expense.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
