 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bunn v. Luthultz, CA 99-1120,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, April 12, 2000, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellee entitled to insurance proceeds because appellant conveyed all of her interest in the proceeds and lost her status as an assignee as she had no insurable interest when she conveyed the property via quitclaim deed.
|
|||||
| Caldwell v. Allenfarm, Inc., No. CA99-724,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, April 12, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Distributor was properly dismissed from appellants' products liability suit for lack of personal jurisdiction, since it had never shipped any goods into Arkansas, and had not sold the product in question to appellants.
|
|||||
| Campbell v. Randal Tyler Ford Mercury, Inc., CA 99-1212,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, April 12, 2000, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant with office job, killed while driving to work, was not within the scope of his employment and widow was not entitled to workers' death benefits.
|
|||||
| Cockerham v. State, No. CACR 99-1065,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, April 12, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sufficient evidence showed that, without reasonable excuse, appellant failed to appear; appellant failed to meet State's hearsay argument with argument he raised on appeal; sentencing argument unpreserved for review.
|
|||||
| East State Area Agency on Aging v. Marshall, No. CA 99-1072,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, April 12, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Entitlement to benefits affirmed; based on testimony and medical evidence in record, certified nurse's aide proved by a preponderance of the evidence that her foot injury arose out of and during the course of her employment.
|
|||||
| Flowers v. State, No. CACR99-946,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, April 12, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant's proximity to others when he fired four shots, three of which missed victim and hit an area over a yard wide near five persons, provided substantial evidence to support aggravated-assault conviction.
|
|||||
| Garrett v. Primestar, Inc., No. CA99-1080,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, April 12, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Language in contracts between allegedly negligent driver, putative employer of driver, and putative employer's alleged independent contractor raised issue concerning relationship between putative employer and driver.
|
|||||
| Grillot v. Leroy & Rosemary Maddox, No. CA 99-947,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, April 12, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In quiet title action, it was not error to find appellees had acquired title by adverse possession where appellants admitted they knew appellees' fence encroached on the property but did nothing to recognize the true boundary.
|
|||||
| Harvill-Byrd Elec. Co. v. Cortese, No. CA99-799,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, April 12, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The weight of medical evidence and resolution of conflicting medical opinions was a question within exclusive province of the Workers' Compensation Commission, and there was substantial evidence to support the decision.
|
|||||
| Johnston v. State, No. CACR 99-990,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, April 12, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction for delivery of a controlled substance was affirmed, since the credibility of witnesses was an issue for the jury to determine, and the jury chose to believe the testimony of the informants.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
