 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bautista v. State, CR 01-497,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 30, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the bare allegation that a notice of appeal was mailed in a timely manner but delayed by the post office was not good cause to excuse the late tender of the notice, defendant's pro se motion to file belated petition for rehearing was denied.
|
|||||
| Butt v. Evans Law Firm, P.A., 01-1307,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 30, 2003, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where attorneys represented taxpayers in a class action lawsuit, the circuit court abused its discretion by applying the percentage of the attorneys' settlement fee against the settlement pool instead of the total amount claimed by the taxpayers.
|
|||||
| Donald v. City of W. Memphis, 02-1173,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 30, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Ellis v. State, CR 02-1060,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 30, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appeal of the denial of appellant's untimely petition for postconviction relief was not permitted to go forward, where it was clear that appellant could not prevail.
|
|||||
| In re Admin. Order No. 14 -- Admin. of Circuit Courts, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 30, 2003, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Fuchs, 02-1234,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 30, 2003, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Kirwan v. State, CR 02-79,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 30, 2003, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant emailed his intentions to take photos and have sex with a minor, although she was a fictional email recipient, and where he drove to her home from another state, there was sufficient evidence to convict him of attempted rape.
|
|||||
| Newman v. State, CR 02-811,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 30, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Scott v. State, CR 01-1052,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 30, 2003, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court's failure to make sufficient written findings after denying defendant postconviction relief prevented the appellate court from effectively reviewing the matter on appeal and warranted reversal and remand to enter specific findings.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
