 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Lloyd v. UPS, CA 99-562,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISIONS ONE, TWO AND FOUR, February 2, 2000, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where doctor gave opinion that claimant's injury was work-related, and there was no medical opinion to the contrary, workers' compensation commission erred in denying benefits on the ground that injury was not compensable.
|
|||||
| Meadors v. Arkadelphia Pub. Schs, CA 99-382,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISIONS THREE AND FOUR, February 2, 2000, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Dismissal of plaintiff's complaint under the Teacher Fair Dismissal Act (Act) was affirmed because plaintiff's salary had not decreased and when plaintiff signed the superseding contract the Act no longer applied.
|
|||||
| Montgomery v. Conway Human Dev. Ctr., No. CA99-514,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, February 2, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Doctor's deposition testimony was sufficient to support workers' compensation commission's finding that employee's injuries were caused by degenerative disc disease; denial of workers' compensation benefits was affirmed.
|
|||||
| Raines v. State, No. CACR 99-524,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, February 2, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because appellant was merely fined as a result of his convictions, the post-conviction remedies he sought were not available to him under the Arkansas Rules of Criminal Procedure, and denial of his motion was affirmed.
|
|||||
| Stewart v. Colvert, No. CA99-770,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, February 2, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Order denying appellant's motion to set aside court order dismissing her suit against appellee affirmed because failure to act within 90 days of the entry of the order of dismissal stripped the circuit court of jurisdiction.
|
|||||
| Strecker v. Holiday Island Suburban Improvement, No. CA 99-748,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, February 2, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant did not suffer a permanent impairment and was not entitled to any permanent-partial disability benefits because more than half the cause of his impairment was a result of his pre-existing degenerative condition.
|
|||||
| Trusty v. Trusty, No. CA99-696,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, February 2, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Wife's testimony of incidences in which husband criticized her weight, spending habits, and threatened to have her retrained, corroborated by other witnesses, was sufficient to prove indignities as grounds for divorce.
|
|||||
| Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Griffin, No. CA99-723,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, February 2, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Watson v. Calvin, CA 99-705,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, February 2, 2000, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where there were tenants still occupying property at the time of closing, sellers breached contract to deliver "possession", and were not entitled to earnest money when appellee refused to close sale.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
