 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Kuykendall v. Kuykendall, CA 00-493,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, February 14, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: There was nothing indicating the enumerated removal factors were intended to be exclusive to preclude the chancellor from considering the particular facts and circumstances of the case that might have had a bearing on the decision.
|
|||||
| McCormick v. State, CACR00-246,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, February 14, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellate court lacked jurisdiction to hear an appeal of a conditional plea of guilty made after the trial court denied appellant's motion to suppress evidence, because appellant did not comply with procedural requirements.
|
|||||
| Nicholson v. Bowers, CA 00-69,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, February 14, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The chancellor determined that the conduct of the parties was more consistent with the purchaser's agreement remaining in effect, despite appellee's failure to make the balloon payment.
|
|||||
| Pettit v. Allstate Ins. Co., CA 00-330,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, February 14, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly determined that insurance company was not liable for uninsured motorist benefits where insurer of other party involved in accident found its insured was not legally liable for property damage.
|
|||||
| Revils v. State, CACR 00-591,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, February 14, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in denying appellant's motion to dismiss where appellant did not demonstrate that he was prejudiced due to the delay in bringing charges or that the State intentionally delayed to gain a tactical advantage.
|
|||||
| Second Injury Fund v. Hogan, CA 00-00610,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, February 14, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellate court affirmed Arkansas Workers' Compensation Commission in light of physicians' testimony and controlling case law, finding combination of disabilities or impairments, and thus appellant's liability.
|
|||||
| Stewart v. Stewart, CA 99-1401,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, February 14, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Two brothers, who had entered into a real estate agreement concerning the purchase of a home, had a binding contract despite the lack of preparation of a note or mortgage.
|
|||||
| Ventress v. State, CACR 00-733,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, February 14, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The appellate court reviewed the challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, affirming the conviction because there was substantial evidence to support it, when viewed in the light most favorable to the State.
|
|||||
| White v. Amtran Corp., CA99-1470,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, February 14, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant's claims of persistent pain after surgery, claim of lower extremity pain inconsistent with diagnostic findings, and claim of pain inconsistent with MRI findings provided a substantial basis for denying his workers' compensation claim.
|
|||||
| Williams v. State, CACR00-289,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, February 14, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where trial court failed to advise appellant of right to court-appointed counsel, inquire into his ability to retain counsel, or warn him of possible consequences of proceeding pro se, convictions were reversed.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
