 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Tester v. Hill, CA01-566,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, February 6, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not make clearly erroneous findings in concluding that gate on road over landowner's property had been in place for more than seven years and that neighbors had no prescriptive easement because their use of road was permissive.
|
|||||
| Tri-County Farmers, Inc. v. Larry, CA 01-381,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, February 6, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgments in favor of plaintiffs arising from a spill of liquid fertilizer on plaintiffs' property were affirmed; defendants failed to raise their arguments with the trial court, and failed to abstract a motion for new trial or remittitur.
|
|||||
| Univ. of Ark. for Med. Scis. v. Mize, CA 01-690,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, February 6, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As the worker injured her knee while turning to respond to a co-worker, she showed a causal connection between her injury and her employment; the commission's finding that her injury was not idiopathic and was compensable was affirmed.
|
|||||
| Wilson v. State, CACR01-442,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, February 6, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A probation revocation and rape conviction were upheld where defendant appeared on first day of trial, but later failed to return, and trial court proceeded without him. Statute permitted trial court to proceed in such circumstances.
|
|||||
| Wilson v. State, CACR01-398,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, February 6, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's battery conviction was affirmed where he failed to request a jury charge that accomplice testimony had to be sufficiently corroborated, and apparently inconsistent verdicts among co-defendants were reconcilable by the evidence.
|
|||||
| Wright v. State, CACR01-635,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, February 6, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court properly allowed a State's witness to testify that the victim was cut with a knife; testimony was presented as to the witness's credentials, and any weakness in the underpinning of the testimony went to weight and credibility.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
