 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Ark. Dep't of Human Servs. v. Huff, 00-1357,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 7, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court's refusal to admit Colorado home study into evidence was not abuse of discretion as person was not available for cross-examination. Returning children to mother without Colorado approval was not clearly erroneous.
|
|||||
| Berna v. Judicial Discipline & Disability Comm'n, 01-1369,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 7, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: State supreme court refused to review the dismissal of an inmate's complaint by the judicial discipline commission where he did not allege error on the record and his assertions of trial or appellate error were outside the commission's purview.
|
|||||
| Bradley v. State, CR 01-681,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 7, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Preponderance of the evidence proved defendant was in constructive possession of anhydrous ammonia, a controlled substance, that was transported in an unlawful container, and was clearly sufficient to revoke his suspended sentences.
|
|||||
| Brewer v. Norris, 01-271,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 7, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was not entitled to habeas corpus relief, as he had not preserved for appellate review his claims of double jeopardy and the vagueness and overbreadth of a statute.
|
|||||
| Farver v. State, CACR 94-913,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 7, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Inmate's coram nobis petition was denied where all of the grounds he asserted for the issuance of the writ were known at the time of trial, and addressed at that time or in the denial of his direct appeal.
|
|||||
| Holmes v. State, CR 01-1057,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 7, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: State did not prove that house occupant consented to officer's entry, where occupant opened the door and stepped back; conclusion that these actions amounted to an invitation would have sanctioned entry based upon inferred consent.
|
|||||
| Johnson v. State, CR 00 1421,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 7, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's appeal failed where he was unable to show the trial court abused its discretion in denying his request for a continuance to hire an attorney on the day of a postconviction hearing, as he had had nearly seven months to obtain counsel.
|
|||||
| Mississippi River Transmission Corp. v. Weiss, 01-527,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 7, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment was improperly granted as amendment to come-to-rest requirement under statute was solely matter for legislative action and when compressor gas was consumed, it came to rest within meaning of statute.
|
|||||
| Roberts v. State, CR 02-22,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 7, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Supreme court granted the State's petition for writ of certiorari for review of prejudicial error and to affirm the trial court's ruling that defendant was competent to waive his right to appeal or to collaterally attack his death sentence.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
