 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Alford v. Hale, CA 03-655,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, February 4, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court erred in ruling that the decedent could not be disinterred; this refusal was contrary to the controlling statutes and regulations that permitted disinterment upon satisfaction of certain conditions, which the children met.
|
|||||
| Andrews v. Polk County Humane Soc'y, CA03-816,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, February 4, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The owner's appeal from a trial court ruling confiscating her animals and placing them in the custody of the humane society was dismissed, as it was not a final judgment, because the issue of damages to be awarded had not been decided.
|
|||||
| Conner v. Donahoo, CA 03-433,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, February 4, 2004, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: On appeal of finding that will was invalid, judgment was reversed; witness who was in adjacent room was in the presence of the testator at the time he subscribed his name to the testatrix's will.
|
|||||
| Dye v. State, CACR03-302,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, February 4, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's drug conviction was proper where the informant was credible and the place to be searched contained in the warrant was described with sufficient particularity.
|
|||||
| Golden v. Golden, CA03-753,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, February 4, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The Arkansas Workers' Compensation Commission correctly determined that a truck-driver who suffered a torn rotator cuff was entitled to a permanent partial disability award of 50 percent and reasonably necessary medical treatment.
|
|||||
| Harris v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs., CA03-235,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, February 4, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Order granting permanent custody of dependent-neglected children to third party was affirmed; trial court properly found that father did not comply with court orders and that no reunification services or no further periodic reviews were required.
|
|||||
| Hegwood v. State, CACR03-423,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, February 4, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: On appeal from second-degree battery conviction, judgment was affirmed; trial court did not err in denying motion for directed verdict and substantial evidence supported the conviction.
|
|||||
| Jackson v. Houchin, CA 03-89,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, February 4, 2004, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Cousin who signed application for minor cousin's driver's license was properly held jointly and severally liable for minor's negligence because his signing brought him within the purview of the statute.
|
|||||
| Kelley v. State, CACR 03-600,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, February 4, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Uncorroborated accomplice testimony was insufficient to support defendant's conviction for possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver and possession of drug paraphernalia. There was no other evidence to link him to the contraband.
|
|||||
| Moore v. Sipes, CA 03-687,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, February 4, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court erred in appointing the grandparents as guardians for the mother's children, where the evidence did not demonstrate that the mother was an unfit parent.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
