 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Cabral v. State, No. CR 06-188,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 1, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An inmate's petition for postconviction relief was properly denied after a first-degree murder conviction because there was no ineffective assistance of counsel based on a failure to object to the introduction of evidence regarding several firearms unconnected to the murder as irrelevant under Ark. R. Evid. 401 since there was no prejudice.
|
|||||
| Hendrix v. Wood, No. CR 06-1219,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 1, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Jackson v. State, No. CR 06-842,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 1, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Under Ark. Code Ann. § 16-42-101, trial court did not err in excluding evidence of victim's prior sexual conduct as it was not related to whether defendant engaged in inappropriate sexual behavior with victim. Exclusion of evidence did not violate defendant's right from presenting defense. State's comments during closing argument were not improper.
|
|||||
| Kuelper v. State, No. CR 06-1310,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 1, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appeal of order denying appellant's petition for postconviction relief was dismissed where petition did not contain his signature, as required by Ark. R. Crim. P. 37.1, and was filed on sixtieth day after mandate was issued. Any subsequent petition would have been filed after sixtieth day and would have been untimely under Ark. R. Crim. P. 37.2(c).
|
|||||
| Looney v. Bank of W. Memphis, No. 07-49,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 1, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where appellant filed motion for rule on clerk to file record and have his appeal docketed, court remanded his case to trial court for compliance with Ark. R. App. P. Civ. 5(b)(1) because while trial court entered order extending appellant's deadline to file record, order made no reference to any findings of trial court as required by Rule 5(b)(1).
|
|||||
| Loveless v. State, No. CR 05-648 and CACR 04-525,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 1, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petitioner's motion for access to a trial transcript, record, files, and any other submission pertaining to his appeal of judgment of conviction and appeal from Ark. R. Crim. P. 37.1 order was denied where he cited no specific reason for requiring the material beyond the claim that material would be helpful to his causes of action in federal court.
|
|||||
| McCullough v. Wyatt, No. 07-06,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 1, 2007, Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petitioner was denied a writ of mandamus to compel a trial judge to enter a default judgment or hold a hearing in his civil action because if petitioner wished to challenge the order dismissing his civil action, his remedy was an appeal from the order, not a mandamus action.
|
|||||
| Reynolds v. State, Nos. CR 06-1173,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 1, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Burnett, No. CR06-581,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 1, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a term of imprisonment was entered after a guilty plea to a drug offense, a trial court erred by later entering an order to seal the criminal record under Ark. Code Ann. § 5-4-311 since expungement was only allowed if a judgment of conviction was not entered; the fact that boot camp was an alternative did not make § 5-4-311 applicable.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
