 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| State v. Lester, CR 00-762,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 15, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in finding unconstitutional a statute authorizing warrantless arrests for gas drive-offs; statute did not violate separation of powers and was not superseded by court rule on warrantless arrests.
|
|||||
| Stilley v. Makris, 00-1102,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 15, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Injunction preventing initiative proposing sale of county hospital being placed on ballot proper where, by its terms, it violated numerous statutes regarding sale of county property and wrongfully impaired existing county contract.
|
|||||
| Whitfield v. State, CR 99-507,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 15, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of petition for post-conviction relief alleging ineffective assistance of counsel for failure to call witness properly denied where witness did not observe murder and would not have been beneficial to client's defense.
|
|||||
| Wood v. Supreme Court Comm. on Prof'l Conduct, 00-1127,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 15, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: No appeal was permitted once an interim suspension was initiated, adjudicated, and imposed after appellee was presented with a file-marked judgment of conviction of felony. Since that occurred, appellant was not entitled to appeal.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
