 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Simpson v. State, 01-141,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 7, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in dismissing defendant's postconviction relief petition of his death sentence as untimely under a rule that did not apply to death penalty cases.
|
|||||
| Smith v. State, CR 01-100,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 7, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Counsel's failure to object during closing argument was within range of permissible professional legal conduct. Defendant did not show counsel was deficient for not calling witness or that defense was prejudiced by absence of witness testimony.
|
|||||
| State v. Ashley, CR 01-774,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 7, 2002, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appeal was dismissed because the State questioned the trial court's application of the public sexual indecency statute to the facts of the case, and not the statute's interpretation.
|
|||||
| Turner v. State, CR 01-459,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 7, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: State supreme court ordered additional briefing where defendant failed to fully brief all adverse rulings associated with the denial of his postconviction relief petition, and instead addressed issues at the original trial.
|
|||||
| Tyson Foods v. Davis, 01-165,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 7, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: General verdict precluded finding theory on which jury decided for farmer suing corporation for fraud and other claims. Evidence outside contract was admissible to prove fraud claim which was not barred by limitations statute or waived.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
