 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Medco, Inc. v. Evans, CA02-501,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, February 5, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Bill of sale, using phrase "grant, sell, and deliver," provided employer would retain a lien on tractor, and that the employee was to make 48 payments for tractor. Employer repossessed the truck arguing it was a lease, but conversion was proven.
|
|||||
| Perkins v. State, CACR-02-530,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, February 5, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not have jurisdiction to revoke defendant's probation after probationary period expired, where he had not been arrested and no warrant was issued for violating his probation prior to expiration of probationary period.
|
|||||
| Ransom v. State, CACR02-229,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, February 5, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sufficient evidence supported the finding that defendant was in possession of property that he knew or had reason to believe was stolen. The court costs billed to defendant were over the statutory limit for misdemeanors of $ 150.
|
|||||
| Rogers v. Rogers, CA 01-1189 and CA 01-1192,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, February 5, 2003, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Even though trial court did not have jurisdiction to dissolve marriage, as there was no corroboration of residence, the trial court had authority to enter orders regarding child support and alimony, including contempt, while an appeal was pending.
|
|||||
| Second Injury Fund v. Lewis, CA02-559,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, February 5, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An unrelated and independently-disabling liver disease was not a subsequent intervening cause that should have rendered the claimant ineligible for workers' compensation benefits where his back injuries occurred well before the liver disease.
|
|||||
| Simmons v. State, CA 02-759,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, February 5, 2003, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where juvenile's abstract and addendum were deficient because juvenile failed to include the video retrieved from store, such that court could not reach merits of the case, the court ordered juvenile to supplement the record and rebrief the case.
|
|||||
| Strickland v. Rancifer, CA 02-261,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, February 5, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court properly determined the truck driver was two-thirds at fault for the driver's injuries where he improperly parked his truck too far from the curb, and the damages awarded were appropriate given the driver's contributory negligence.
|
|||||
| Terrell v. Ark. Trucking Serv., CA 02-638,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, February 5, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Workers' compensation claimant failed to show he was entitled to vocational rehabilitation, PPD benefits, or wage loss in excess of that already paid under a previous disability award, or that further psychological treatment was necessary.
|
|||||
| Tolston v. State, CACR02-447,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, February 5, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant failed to raise his challenge in the trial court that the trial court erred in failing to apply the code provision that was in effect at the time of his offense, defendant's argument was not preserved for appellate review.
|
|||||
| Wilson v. State, CACR 02-330,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, February 5, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: There was substantial evidence to support the verdicts and the appellate court would not second-guess the jury's assessment of witness credibility. The excited-utterance exception to hearsay applied to the daughter's testimony.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
