 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Anthony v. State, No. CACR 99-296,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, February 9, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence at trial was sufficient for conviction of delivery of cocaine; jury was free to believe testimony of the only police officer to witness the drug transaction, and that testimony established that transaction occurred.
|
|||||
| Barnes v. Newton, CA 99-458,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISIONS ONE, TWO AND FOUR, February 9, 2000, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court reversed a custody order where there was no change in circumstances that warranted a change of physical custody.
|
|||||
| C B Masonry, Inc. v. Rolle, No. E99-111,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, February 9, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Substantial evidence supported board's conclusion that appellee was entitled to unemployment benefits where the evidence suggested appellee was laid off due to short-term unavailability of work, and not for misconduct.
|
|||||
| Coleman v. State, No. CACR 99-590,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, February 9, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Eyewitnesses' testimony who saw appellant shoot victim was sufficient to prove that appellant had firearm instead of BB gun; the evidence proved crime of felon in possession of firearm sufficient to revoke appellant's suspended sentence.
|
|||||
| Cotton v. State, No. CACR 99-504,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, February 9, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the information was amended well in advance of trial, and appellant did not timely object to admission of evidence of his probation or to jury instructions regarding increased sentencing, the conviction was affirmed.
|
|||||
| Duncan v. Arkansas Dep't of Human Servs., No. CA 99-527,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, February 9, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant's deficiencies in keeping a job, in reforming her current lifestyle, and in other areas amounted to situation that was detrimental to the children's health and well being; thus, her parental rights were terminated.
|
|||||
| Edwards v. First Brands Corp., No. CA99-675,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, February 9, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where substantial evidence supported the decision that appellant had failed to rebut the presumption that her use of illegal drugs substantially occasioned her accident, denial of workers' compensation benefits was affirmed.
|
|||||
| Farrakhan v. State, No. CACR 99-719,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, February 9, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an appeal of rape conviction, it was not an abuse of discretion to declare a mistrial because the trial court was in best position to evaluate issue of deadlocked jury, and the case otherwise did not involve complex facts.
|
|||||
| Gaines v. SMI Joist Co., No. CA 99-739,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, February 9, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where questions of credibility and the weight to be given evidence were exclusively within the province of the workers' compensation commission and it gave greater weight to medical records, denial of benefits was affirmed.
|
|||||
| Gaston v. State, No. CACR99-772,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, February 9, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A criminal defendant's inflammatory statements about a prior shooting, and her daughter's excited utterances, were admissible where probative value outweighed potential prejudice.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
