 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Johnson v. State, CACR 99-1000,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, May 3, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant stated that he had no intention to steal car; trial court, as trier of fact, did not accept his explanation and convicted him of felony breaking or entering. There was sufficient evidence to support his conviction.
|
|||||
| Jones v. Ellison, CA 99-803,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISIONS ONE AND TWO, May 3, 2000, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Decedent recited words of testamentary intent to give appellee her dog and contents of the jewelry box, no evidence that appellee tampered with note, no abuse of discretion by admitting note as part of decedent's will.
|
|||||
| Kassees v. Wilson, CA 99-1144,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, May 3, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a wrongful death action, court dismissed the appeal without prejudice for want of jurisdiction because no final order had been entered as to the two John Doe appellees.
|
|||||
| Marroquin v. State, CACR 99-1036,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, May 3, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Criminal defendant did successfully challenge constitutionality of peremptory-challenge statute since he did not show how State's peremptory strike of white male juror had prejudicial impact on him or on any juror.
|
|||||
| Patterson v. Ark. Dep't of Health, CA 99-438,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS , DIVISIONS TWO, THREE AND FOUR, May 3, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Workers' compensation commission's decision that claimant was 80 percent disabled was reversed and remanded for benefits; under odd-lot doctrine, claimant was permanently and totally disabled.
|
|||||
| Replogle v. United States Truck, Inc., CA99-1039,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, May 3, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant had ample notice, including complaint and copies of caselaw from plaintiff, that plaintiff intended to rely on Indiana law, despite innocent error mentioning Illinois, so dismissal was abuse of discretion.
|
|||||
| Robinson v. State, CACR99-1025,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, May 3, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Withdrawal of representation of convicted appellant appropriate where counsel supported request through the record and in brief that appellant's challenge to his conviction would be meritless.
|
|||||
| Strawbridge v. State, CACR96-1237,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, May 3, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Felony theft by receiving conviction was reduced to misdemeanor, because State offered no evidence as to 17-year-old truck's value; other error allegations were procedurally barred for failure to properly challenge at trial.
|
|||||
| Thompson v. State, CACR 99-1345,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, May 3, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where appellant failed to move for a directed verdict at the close of the State's case or the close of all of the evidence in his revocation proceeding, he failed to preserve his insufficient evidence argument for appellate review.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
