LexisNexis
  
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Arkansas - February 13, 2002

  
Smith v. Alcoa, CA 01-645, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, February 13, 2002, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Workers' compensation commission case was remanded where the commission had erroneously declined to consider a claimant's argument that his employer should be estopped from asserting the statute of limitations as a defense against his claim.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Smith v. State, CACR01-877, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, February 13, 2002, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Evidence had not been tampered with and was authentic, there was no obvious disparity in descriptions of evidence submitted. Defendant's proximity to contraband and prior drug convictions were enough to support finding that he possessed cocaine.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Sturgis v. Clifton, CA 01-945, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, February 13, 2002, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Genuine issues of material fact existed as to fraudulent concealment. Wife's fraud claims included allegations that were self-concealing, there were questions as to whether wife could have discovered scheme by exercise of reasonable diligence.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

 www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us
  Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.