 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Rusak v. State, No. CR06-87,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 9, 2006, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant's attorneys tendered the record on appeal late due to a mistake on their part, the court granted defendant's motion for rule on clerk.
|
|||||
| Scott v. State, No. CR 05-351,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 9, 2006, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellate court affirmed the dismissal of an individual's petition for postconviction relief pursuant to Ark. R. Crim. P. 37.1 because the individual had been dismissed by the time the petition came up for hearing and the "in custody" requirement did not violate the individual's equal protection rights.
|
|||||
| Smith v. AJ&K Operating Co., No. 05-193,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 9, 2006, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The supreme court declined to reverse the trial court's order that implemented the directive of a prior mandate that allowed a temporary restraining order to be modified to allow the oil companies to remediate and clean up land under such reasonable guidelines as the trial court might establish.
|
|||||
| Smith v. State, No. CR 05-27,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 9, 2006, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant convicted of first-degree murder was not entitled to postconviction relief under Ark. R. Crim. P. 37.1, due to the trial court's admission of allegedly false photographs of appellant's truck. There was other trial evidence to show that appellant's ex-wife was bleeding in his truck. Counsel was not deficient for failing to object.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
