 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Smith v. State, No. CACR99-813,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, February 9, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The speedy trial clock in defendant's case ran from the date the arrest warrant on the theft charge was served and not from the date the defendant was arrested for parole violations.
|
|||||
| Srebalus v. Rose Care, Inc., CA 99-704,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, February 9, 2000, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment was not appropriate because whether payments made by self-insured employer to employee injured on her way to work were workers' compensation benefits, voluntary payments, or mistake was question of fact.
|
|||||
| Thurston v. Martinez, No. CA99-780,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, February 9, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Order terminating grandmother's guardianship over her grandchildren in favor of custody with their mother was reversed where the lower court failed to determine if termination was in the children's best interest.
|
|||||
| Ussery v. State, No. CACR99-873,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, February 9, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Revocation of suspended sentence was affirmed, since appellant only objected to admission of evidence on hearsay grounds at trial, thus, issue of whether it violated his right to confront witnesses was not properly preserved.
|
|||||
| Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Royal, No. CA 99-777,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, February 9, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court affirmed claimant's award of worker's compensation benefits because it was supported by substantial evidence that claimant sustained a compensable injury.
|
|||||
| Witherspoon v. State, No. CACR99-774,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, February 9, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction was affirmed because the affidavit upon which the search warrant was issued was valid and contained sufficient indicia of the informant's reliability.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
