 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| BNL Equity Corp. v. Pearson, 99-78,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 10, 2000, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court concluded that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting class certification because the criteria of typicality, predominance, and superiority were established.
|
|||||
| Eads v. Hall, 99-1247,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 10, 2000, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellees were entitled to costs and attorney's fees when appellants filed a motion for rule on clerk for the court to accept the record for appeal purposes after their appeal had been dismissed.
|
|||||
| Jones v. State, CR 98-1091,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 10, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court denied rehearing, but clarified that the ineffective assistance of counsel standard was a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.
|
|||||
| Maier v. State, No. CR 99-1305,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 10, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| McCastlain v. Elmore, 99-541,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 10, 2000, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because prosecuting attorney candidate could not have re-filed her election contest within the 20-day statute of limitations and savings statute did not apply, the trial court should have dismissed complaint with prejudice.
|
|||||
| McCutchen v. Patton, 99-718,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 10, 2000, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An advisory committee was not a department or other city agency within the meaning of the statute; and therefore appellant was unable to establish a triable issue of material fact.
|
|||||
| Olive v. State, CR 99-926,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 10, 2000, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because appellant's invocation of right to counsel for robbery charge was case specific, it did not constitute an invocation of that right for murder interrogation, so motion to suppress murder confession was properly denied.
|
|||||
| Pike v. Benton Circuit Court, CR 99-982,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 10, 2000, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petitioner's proper remedy was to appeal the circuit court's denial of the motion to dismiss and finding of contempt, not to seek a writ of prohibition.
|
|||||
| Richards v. State, No. CR 97-1536,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 10, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
