Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
   State Courts - Arkansas - February 8, 2007
  
Aikens v. State, No. CR06-928, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 8, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: A circuit court erred by failing to refund a $3.00 fee charged by a bailiff for potential juror information because such a fee violated Ark. R. Crim. P. 32.1 since the provision of such information was mandatory; there was no statute or rule allowing the charging of any such fee.

Search Cases for Free
  
CJ Bldg. Corp. v. TRAC-10, No. 06-483, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 8, 2007, Delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: In a dispute between a contractor and a corporation over the quality of corporation's work on a project, trial court properly awarded contractor attorney's fees because contractor was prevailing party under Ark. Code Ann. ? 16-22-308. Contractor "came out on top" because it was awarded three-fourths of money at issue.

Search Cases for Free
  
Cloverdale Neighborhood Ass'n v. Goss, No. 07-62, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 8, 2007, Delivered
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free
  
Dep't of Health & Human Servs. v. R.C., No. 06-858, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 8, 2007, Delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: Substantial evidence supported an administrative law judge's finding that foster mother caused a nonaccidental physical injury to child under Ark. Code Ann. ? 12-12-503(2)(A)(v) because child had bruising on the back of her thighs from the back of her knees to the bottom of her buttocks and mother stated that she had used a switch to swat child.

Search Cases for Free
  
Hooten v. Cottrell, No. 06-1167, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 8, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: An inmate's motion for reconsideration of the motion to proceed in forma pauperis was denied where, pursuant to Ark. R. Civ. P. 72, his assertion of prejudice, which was not substantiated, was insufficient to establish that he had a colorable cause of action with respect to either the petition for writ of mandamus or the underlying civil suit.

Search Cases for Free
  
Johnson v. State, No. CR 06-1304, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 8, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: The State's motion to dismiss defendant's appeal was denied where although defendant's counsel's motion to be relieved showed service on defendant and a copy of the order granting the motion was mailed to defendant, it was likely that he was unaware of the date the brief was to be filed; defendant was directed to file a brief within thirty days.

Search Cases for Free
  
Lenox v. State, No. CR 07-64, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 8, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free
  
Love v. State, No. CR 06-1236, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 8, 2007, Delivered
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free
  
Mobley v. Dooley, No. 07-72, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 8, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: Appellant's motion for rule on clerk was denied; pursuant to Ark. R. App. P. Civ. 5(b)(1), there was no order extending the time in which to file the record, and the record was filed on January 19, 2007, past the December 27, 2006, deadline.

Search Cases for Free
  
Navarro v. State, No. CR06-549, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 8, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free
  
Back to Top
  


Copyright© 2011 LexisNexis®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.