 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Tuck v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs. , CA05-493,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, February 15, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a permanency planning/no reunification order had not satisfied requirements for finality as it did not contain an Ark. R. Civ. P. 54(b) certification satisfying Ark. R. App. P. Civ. 2(c)(3)(B), mother failed to appeal the order from a review hearing, and therefore, the appellate court lacked jurisdiction and had to dismiss the appeal.
|
|||||
| Walker v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs., CA05-893,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, February 15, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Counsel's Linker-Flores motion to withdraw was granted and termination of parental rights under Ark. Code Ann. § 9-27-341 was affirmed; inter alia, mother testified she had used drugs for 10 years, had bought products to manufacture methamphetamine for income, and had utilized every service State could offer but could not overcome her drug habit.
|
|||||
| Walton v. MacLean Fogg, CA05-930,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, February 15, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Order from Arkansas Workers' Compensation Commission that employee had only a five percent anatomical impairment to body as whole was upheld where review of wage loss factors in Ark. Code Ann. § 11-9-522(b)(1), combined with fact that employee was currently earning higher wage at his new employment than he did at time of injury, supported decision.
|
|||||
| Walton v. State, CACR03-395,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, February 15, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The appellate court did not allow defendant's counsel to withdraw representation where his brief did not comply with Ark. Sup. Ct. & Ct. App. R. 4-3(j) and counsel did not meet his obligations under Ark. R. App. P. Crim. 16(a) and Ark. R. Prof. Conduct 1.1 to submit a brief in which his client's Sixth Amendment rights were protected.
|
|||||
| Webb v. State, CACR05-773,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, February 15, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The dismissal of defendant's appeal was proper where he did not appeal from the judgment and conviction order that was entered based on his conditional guilty plea. Defendant appealed from the plea agreement itself, which was insufficient under Ark. R. Crim. P. 24.3 to grant the court jurisdiction to hear his appeal.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
