 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Peters v. State, No. CACR 99-407,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, February 16, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff state was not required to prove defendant possessed marijuana for parole revocation, as parole officer testified defendant failed to attend meetings or pay fines and fees, which clearly violated terms of his parole.
|
|||||
| Smith v. City of Pottsville, No. CACR 99-574,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, February 16, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A defendant's convictions were upheld where there was substantial evidence to convict, her written statement was admissible, and there was no prosecutorial misconduct.
|
|||||
| Tucker v. Roberts-McNutt, Inc., No. CA 99-823,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, February 16, 2000, Opinion Delivered and Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In claim for workers' compensation benefits resulting from work-related back injury, decision of commission denying benefits reversed where opinion did not display substantial basis for denying appellant's claim.
|
|||||
| Tyler v. Thomas, No. CA 99-472,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, February 16, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A landowner failed to establish that he had a prescriptive easement with respect to an adjoining landowner's property because his use of the adjoining landowner's property was permissive, not adverse.
|
|||||
| Vansickle v. Hestir, No. CA 99-850,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, February 16, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Commission's reversal of finding of compensable aggravation to prior hip injury was supported by substantial evidence that injury was not reported immediately although knowledge of injury and pain should have been immediate.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
