 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Skelton v. Wash. Reg'l Med. Ctr., CA02-659,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, February 12, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Arkansas Workers' Compensation Commission did not err in finding that a claimant sustained a non-compensable idiopathic fall; the medical evidence suggested that the claimant's fall was personal in nature.
|
|||||
| Stewart v. Clark, CA 02-389,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, February 12, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where mother failed to raise challenges to failure of the trial court to apply an Arkansas statute and failure to apply the full faith and credit clause to her judgment on child support arrears, the issues were not preserved for appellate review.
|
|||||
| Taylor v. State, CACR02-375,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, February 12, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court did not err by refusing to require the disclosure of the confidential informant's identity to defendant, as it was not necessary to prepare an adequate defense. Any error in not requiring disclosure would be harmless.
|
|||||
| Wycoff v. State, CACR 02-547,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, February 12, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err by permitting the State to amend the information to add an additional charge of second-degree battery on the day of the trial where defendant was aware of the facts to support the count and he failed to move for a continuance.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
