 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Simmons v. Simmons, CA06-303,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, February 14, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court erred by awarding a former wife an interest in land that a former husband inherited from his mother because a postnuptial agreement was not binding since the parties' marriage was not adequate consideration; moreover, there were no mutual obligations since the wife was not required to do anything.
|
|||||
| Southall v. Hill, CA06-504,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, February 14, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a quiet title action, a claim under Ark. Code Ann. § 18-60-506 failed because two owners failed to present any instrument at trial that purported to convey them land lying west of a creek; the quantity in their deed yielded to the course and distance, which yielded to artificial and natural objects.
|
|||||
| White v. State, CACR06-413,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, February 14, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence was insufficient to sustain defendant's possession conviction because the State failed to prove that defendant constructively possessed narcotics found on top of the kitchen cabinets in a jointly occupied apartment; other persons had access to the apartment, and none of defendant's possessions were found with the controlled substances.
|
|||||
| Whitten v. Rich, CA 06-530,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, February 14, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because an appeal from an order granting specific performance of a real estate contract did not dispose of appellees' claims for damages and there was no Ark. R. Civ. P. 54(b) certification made by the trial court, the appellate court did not have jurisdiction to entertain the appeal.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
