 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Barnett v. State, No. CACR 08-1007,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, March 4, 2009, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion to suppress the two statements that he made to a police officer because defendant was not "in custody" for purposes of Miranda when either of the statements were made; defendant voluntarily and of his own accord presented himself at the sheriff's department on the days he made the statements.
|
|||||
| Broussard v. Jones, No. CA 08-694,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, March 4, 2009, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Order denying appellants' motion to set aside default judgment in appellee's action claiming that they ousted him from membership in unincorporated adult entertainment association was upheld because trial court had before it conflicting versions of events and chose to believe appellee's claim that he sent notice of hearing to appellants' attorney.
|
|||||
| Chamness v. Wendy's Rest., No. CA08-544,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, March 4, 2009, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Workers' compensation claimant's request for additional benefits on ground that her back injury resulted in permanent impairment was properly denied because she did not exercise due diligence in obtaining deposition of her physician, as required by Ark. Code Ann. ¿ 11-9-705(c)(1)(A); physician had evaluated her more than three years before hearing.
|
|||||
| City of Jonesboro v. Morgan, No. CA08-920,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, March 4, 2009, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A Workers' Compensation Commission's decision to award wage-loss disability of 55 percent over and above a claimant's 12 percent anatomical impairment, pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. ¿ 11-9-522, was affirmed because there was substantial evidence that the claimant could not be a consistently reliable and dependable employee for suitable re-employment.
|
|||||
| Deutscher v. ALCOA, No. CA08-669,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, March 4, 2009, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Evans v. Deboer, No. CA08-466,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, March 4, 2009, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Hasman v. State, No. CACR08-570,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, March 4, 2009, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Hickman v. Hickman, No. CA 08-800,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, March 4, 2009, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appeal of order in divorce case granting specific performance to spouses' daughter and her husband of oral contract to convey property was dismissed because trial court made no final disposition regarding income from wells in which spouses had acquired interest during marriage; order was not final and appealable under Ark. R. App. P. Civ. 2(a)(1).
|
|||||
| Hill v. State, No. CACR08-626,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, March 4, 2009, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
