 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Stilley v. Hubbs, 00-1141,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 1, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Respondents were not entitled to an award of attorney's fees as respondents had to show petitioner's action involved the complete absence of a justiciable issue and petitioner's proposed initiative measure did not meet that requirement.
|
|||||
| Tucker v. State, CR 00-1169,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 1, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Convicted murderer's motion for postconviction relief was dismissed and declared moot petition was filed not filed within 60 days of the date the mandate was issued upon affirmance of the judgment.
|
|||||
| Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Londagin, 00-1083,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 1, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Customer complaint settlement was admissible in suit against repair facility by party injured from defect in repaired vehicle; repair facility videotaping capability was admissible; directed verdict for customer was proper.
|
|||||
| Yamaha Motor Corp. v. Richard's Honda Yamaha, 00-846,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 1, 2001, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: State motor vehicle commission had no jurisdiction to hear other dealers' protests when motor company decided to enter into an agreement with an additional dealer and notified commission of its intentions.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
