 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| State v. L.P., No. 06-990,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 15, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellee juvenile's statements were properly suppressed in his delinquency action because although police detectives read him his Miranda rights and appellee understood those rights, the authorities failed to notify appellee's parent that appellee had been taken into custody as required by Ark. Code. Ann. § 9-27-317(h)(2)(A).
|
|||||
| Taylor v. Taylor, No. 06-441,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 15, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Alimony award to a former wife in a divorce action was proper when the wife chose to home-school minor children, was a stay at home mother, and had no marketable skills or meaningful employment history, but travel trailer in which the husband lived was not marital property when no evidence showed that the husband owned any interest in the trailer.
|
|||||
| Wilkins & Assocs. v. Vimy Ridge Mun. Water Improvement Dist. 139, No. 06-831,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 15, 2007, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant's appeal from order granting appellee's motion for summary judgment was dismissed because appellate court was barred from from considering appeal under Ark. R. Civ. P. 54(b) due to lack of final order as claims against multiple parties might remain viable, and appellant's addendum was deficient as it not contain copy of city ordinance.
|
|||||
| Young v. State, No. CR 06-587,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 15, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The denial of an inmate's Ark. R. Crim. P. 37.1 petition for postconviction relief was improper because the circuit court was obligated to rule on claims raised in the inmate's initial petition which was timely filed and verified in accordance with the rule.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
