|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Arkansas - March 4, 2009
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Stewart v. Copeland Holdings, LLC, No. CA08-896,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, March 4, 2009, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free
|
Overview: Summary judgment requiring return of the buyer's earnest money was affirmed, because the husband and wife were the only persons identified in the contract, and the husband and wife held no interest in the property since they had conveyed their interest to the limited liability company, which was not a party to the contract.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|