 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Irons v. Ark. Dep't of Fin. & Admin., No. CA08-904,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, March 4, 2009, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A licensee, appealing the administrative suspension of his driver's license for driving while intoxicated, erroneously based his motion to dismiss on Ark. Code Ann. ¿ 5-65-402(a)(8)(F)(i) because such section was inapplicable in judicial review of an administrative hearing.
|
|||||
| Ozark Health, Inc. v. Works, No. CA08-779,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, March 4, 2009, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Rita Lowry & L&R Smoke Shop v. Glidewell Distrib. Co., No. CA08-873,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, March 4, 2009, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: It was proper to rule against an owner on an open account held by a distributing company because sufficient evidence supported the trial court's refusal to find a transfer of the owner's interest in a store. The owner's testimony provided no clear impression that the failure to find that the store was a gift to her daughter was clearly erroneous.
|
|||||
| Smith v. State, CACR08-966,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, March 4, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Stewart v. Copeland Holdings, LLC, No. CA08-896,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, March 4, 2009, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment requiring return of the buyer's earnest money was affirmed, because the husband and wife were the only persons identified in the contract, and the husband and wife held no interest in the property since they had conveyed their interest to the limited liability company, which was not a party to the contract.
|
|||||
| Wilson v. Vaughn, No. CA08-801,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, March 4, 2009, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Dismissal of the collector's action for a share of the proceeds collected on the company's small-claims judgment was affirmed, because the testimony supported the finding that the parties rescinded the agreement.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
