 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Baptist Health v. Cox, CA02-734,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, February 19, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Employer did not satisfy obligations to provide suitable employment available, by making employee aware of low paying jobs. Employee with infectious disease was entitled to temporary-total-disability benefits as she could not return to patient care.
|
|||||
| Brown v. Johnson, CA 02-606,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, February 19, 2003, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the term "heir" in a deed meant the natural children of the grantees, an adopted child was not entitled to share in a remainder interest in certain property.
|
|||||
| Davies v. State, CACR02-614,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, February 19, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court did not err by reserving its ruling on defendant's directed verdict motion at the close of the State's case and later denying it, as being on private or public property had no bearing on whether a person was guilty of DWI.
|
|||||
| Delta Plastics v. Dir., E02-115,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, February 19, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Employee's failure to clock out of workplace when leaving to pay bills was not misconduct sufficient to disqualify employee from receiving unemployment benefits where employee informed supervisors of absence and policy was not uniformly enforced.
|
|||||
| Elkins v. State, CACR 02-396,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, February 19, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where testimony showed that defendant struck the child with a pool stick on the arm and knee with sufficient force to leave bruises, sufficient evidence supported the finding that defendant violated terms of his suspended sentence.
|
|||||
| Langston v. Langston, CA02-928,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, February 19, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court properly awarded the father custody of the parties' children and correctly assessed the welfare and best interests of the children. The children's expressed desire to live with their father was not the sole deciding factor.
|
|||||
| Marshall v. Madison County, CA 02-517,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, February 19, 2003, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The Arkansas Workers' Compensation Commission was correct in affirming the denial of a claimant's request for additional disability benefits; the Commission displayed a substantial basis for the denial of the relief requested by the claimant.
|
|||||
| Neill v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co., CA 02-605,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISIONS TWO AND THREE, February 19, 2003, Opinion DeliveredDecided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment was inappropriate in suit by insurer seeking to void property insurance policy on the grounds that insured fraudulently failed to disclose prior fire losses as evidence raised issue as to whether failure was inadvertent.
|
|||||
| Nuehring v. State, CACR01-1341,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, February 19, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's appeal from his conviction for first-degree battery was improper where defendant failed to include in his addendum the notice of appeal, the amended felony information, and the prior convictions introduced by the State.
|
|||||
| Phillips v. State, CACR 02-550,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, February 19, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In defendant's trial for assault and fleeing, the State's presentation of evidence of the presence of PCP in defendant's blood at the time of the alleged crimes was a collateral matter, and it was impeachment with impermissible extrinsic evidence.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
