 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Ark. Okla. Gas Corp. v. City of Van Buren, CA 03-541,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, February 19, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In corporation's appeal of adverse decision in case against city, judgment was affirmed; because corporation had nonexclusive franchise with city, city did not owe a duty to the corporation beyond those contained in the franchise agreement.
|
|||||
| Bramlett v. State, CR 03-400,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 19, 2004, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Construing an amended statute that set the legal limit for blood alcohol concentration with a statute that defined the blood alcohol concentration computation, defendant's blood alcohol level was clearly over the redefined legal limit.
|
|||||
| Carlew v. Wright, 02-1387,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 19, 2004, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a tort suit arising from an automobile accident, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting a motion for a new trial when the evidence did not support the jury's apportionment of liability among the drivers.
|
|||||
| Carter v. State, CR 03-148,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 19, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because an inmate was unable to establish that the chain of custody had not been broken on certain evidence that had been lost or destroyed, his petition for a writ of habeas corpus seeking additional scientific testing was denied.
|
|||||
| Holt v. State, CA CR 03-725,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, February 19, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court properly denied defendant's motion in arrest of judgment. It was irrelevant that the statute defining sexual misconduct had been repealed at the time of his plea. The statute was in effect at the time he committed the offense.
|
|||||
| Hutts v. State, CR 02-964,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 19, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An inmate's petition for post-conviction relief was properly denied because defense counsel's manner of questioning witnesses was merely a matter of trial tactics; therefore, it did not amount to ineffective assistance of counsel.
|
|||||
| Isom v. State, CR 02-213,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 19, 2004, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence was sufficient to sustain capital murder conviction, where defendant broke into home, raped one victim, stole money, and killed another victim; this was done under circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to value of human life.
|
|||||
| Jones v. State, CR 03-491,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 19, 2004, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Kelley v. State, CR 04-99,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 19, 2004, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
