LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Arkansas - February 23, 2006

  
Cox v. State, No. CR 05-80, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 23, 2006, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: After revoking defendant's probation for controlled substance offenses, a court did not err in ordering him to serve a 40-year sentence as it could have done originally because Ark. Code Ann. § 5-4-309(f)(1)(A) applied. Section 16-93-402(e)(5) was inapplicable because no sentence was originally imposed on him; he was placed on probation and fined.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Daniels v. Dennis, No. 05-1351, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 23, 2006, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: In judge's challenge to constitutionality of Ark. Code Ann. § 16-13-104, trial court properly found statute was unconstitutional because Ark. Const. amend. 80, § 16 provided qualifications for judicial candidates; the constitution controlled and voided the statute. Secretary of State's reliance on Ark. Const. amend. 29 was unavailing.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Harrison v. State, No. CR 05-64, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 23, 2006, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: Appellate court reversed the denial of an inmate's motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Ark. R. Crim. P. 37.1 because the trial court denied the motion without issuing any written findings as required by Ark. R. Crim. P. 37.3.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Hudson v. Kyle, No. 05-509, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 23, 2006, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: Order granting mother's motion to terminate father's visitation rights with his child was upheld because it was trial court's prerogative to consider mother's testimony, and specifically her concerns for her daughter's mental health, to be more credible. Trial court also did not err in revisiting facts that were received in a prior trial of matter.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re A Special Judge, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL], SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 23, 2006, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Johnson v. State, No. CR 05-890, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 23, 2006, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: Appellate court denied defendant's pro se motion to file a belated appeal where a prior motion filed by defendant's attorney had previously been denied.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Maxwell v. State, No. CR 05-421, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 23, 2006, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: Appellate court affirmed the denial of an inmate's petition for postconviction relief because the inmate did not verify the petition as required by Ark. R. Crim. P. 37.1(d).

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
McDaniel v. State, No. CR 06-65, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 23, 2006, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: Where an inmate filed his motion for a belated appeal for Ark. R. Crim. P. 37 relief well beyond the 60-day requirement in Ark. R. Crim. P. 37.2, the inmate's motion was denied.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Morgan v. State, No. CR 06-133, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 23, 2006, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Ratchford v. State, No. CR 05-317, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 23, 2006, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: Appellate court reversed the denial of an inmate's petition for postconviction relief and remanded the matter to the trial court to hold an evidentiary hearing on the authenticity of the inmate's signature verifying his Ark. R. Crim. P. 37.1 petition as required by Rule 37.1(d).

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.