 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Jordan v. State, CA 00-00469,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, March 7, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Conviction for second degree battery was reversed. While appellant was in close proximity to his co-defendant when co-defendant hit victim, there was no evidence appellant aided, abetted, or encouraged co-defendant to strike victim.
|
|||||
| Maxwell v. State, CA CR 00-626,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, March 7, 2001, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Using appellant's requests for admissions against her violated the rule that an admission made for the purpose of a pending action was not an admission for any other purpose, nor could it be used against her in other proceedings.
|
|||||
| McCloud v. State, CACR00-690,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, March 7, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Revocation of probation supported by a preponderance of the evidence appellant inexcusably failed to comply with the conditions of his probation and his counsel was permitted to withdraw where appeal was frivolous.
|
|||||
| Miller County v. Stewart, CA00-612,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, March 7, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Agency's decision that worker's back surgery was reasonable and necessary medical treatment for his work-related injury was supported by substantial evidence.
|
|||||
| Morrow v. State, CA CR 00-759,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, March 7, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Merely because officer, in search warrant affidavit, stated he "instructed" a private citizen to make amends with appellant so she could witness his drug trafficking did not make citizen an agent of government for purposes of Fourth Amendment.
|
|||||
| Putman v. State, CA 99-01429,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, March 7, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of directed verdict as to first-degree terroristic threatening charge against student, and his conviction, were affirmed without reaching merits because he failed to move for directed verdict at end of entire case.
|
|||||
| Robinson v. State, CACR99-1112,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, March 7, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Unlawful discharge of firearm from vehicle and unlawful possession of firearm convictions upheld where appellate arguments were either unpreserved or lacking substantive merit, and evidence was sufficient to support verdict.
|
|||||
| Schueller v. Schueller, CA 00-764,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, March 7, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant's 22 page document was better described as a recapping of his points of appeal, with additional commentary. No citations of authority applicable to the points raised were given and the "arguments" were not well-developed.
|
|||||
| Spencer v. Regions Bank, CA 00-624,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, March 7, 2001, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly granted summary judgment and dismissed appellants' action because the relative's estate was not diminished by the failure of the relative's attorney to direct disposition of the remaining personal property of her estate.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
